Talk:Henry Seamount

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Amkgp (talk) 05:34, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that Henry Seamount was hydrothermally active in the last 4,000 years even though it is 126 million years old?

Moved to mainspace by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk). Self-nominated at 20:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith Interesting:

QPQ: - Not done
Overall: (t · c) buidhe 06:39, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

@Buidhe:QPQ incoming. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:54, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

• buidhe, the QPQ review (Template:Did you know nominations/St Trinnean's School) appears to have been completed. Please finish this review when you get the chance. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:54, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

• Assuming that JJ is OK using that review as a QPQ for this nomination. (t · c) buidhe 04:03, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

• Yeah, that review is meant to be the QPQ for this nomination. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:58, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Frontiers

Is this a reliable source? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:29, 21 December 2020 (UTC)