Talk:Hebrew Gospel hypothesis/Archive 2
| This is an archive of past discussions about Hebrew Gospel hypothesis. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
The New Scholarship
At the turn of the Century, scholars started to take a second look at Papias and many historians are now taking the position that his testimony preserved by Eusebius may "be fairly trustworthy." Blackwell (2010) p 301
Indeed, there has been some serious pushback to "Critical studies showing Papias is untenable." Scholars agree that the Gospel of Matthew was not a translation of the Hebrew Gospel. However, they argue that the Papias note never stated that the Hebrew Gospel was translated into the canonical Gospel of Matthew. Indeed, to say that 'Hebrew Matthew' could not exist because it was never translated into 'canonical Matthew' is a "spurious intellectual argument". The "translation issue" does not call into question the existence of the Hebrew gospel. The Dead Sea Scrolls have shown that Hebrew and Aramaic texts did exist without ever having been translated into Koine Greek. Furthermore, the Dead sea Scrolls show Hebraidi dialecto, can refer to 'vocabulary', or 'vocabulary and style' but never should be translated as 'Koine Greek'. Some scholars have gone so far as to argue that the opposition to the Hebrew Gospel may have its roots in anti-Semitism.
In any event as leading British historian Maurice Casey points out, there can be little doubt as to what Papias meant! "It is genuinely true that the apostle Matthew" compiled the sayings/oracles in a Hebrew language, but each (person) translated/ interpreted them as he was able. There is every reason to believe this. Casey 2010 p 86
Bart Ehrman and James Edwards now support Casey and argue that the Papias tradition "is a testimony that explicitly and credibly traces its own lineage directly back to the disciples of Jesus themselves." Ehrman 2012 pp 98-101 (ie the apostolic fountainhead) "It is in any case very early, within living memory of the apostolic age." James R. Edwards, 2009. pp 2-3
Indeed there can be no denying the striking and incontestable fact that the Apostle Matthew wrote the Hebrew Gospel. The widespread agreement of early sources on a number of points is remarkable and cannot be brushed aside, particularly since discrepancies among these sources regarding other points strongly suggest that they are not, for the most part, simply copying one another. Blackwell (2009) p 602 In total there are more than 75 ancient witnesses who testified to the fact that this Hebrew Gospel was in wide circulation. Twelve of the Early Church Fathers testified that it was written by the Apostle Matthew. No ancient writer either Christian or Non Christian challenged these two facts. Edwards (2009) p 259, p 102 & p 117.
|
The external evidence re Papias |
|---|
| References adduced by Ret.Prof (talk · contribs) |
|
To those cynical of excavations of imaginary strata in an imaginary source document, the external evidence looks like a rock in a weary land. "And indeed, if we go back to the door of that library at Harvard and listen closely, we can hear a few voices insisting that the breadth, consistency and unanimity of the external evidence ought to be taken seriously!" Our challenge is to write an article on this topic from a NPOV - Ret.Prof (talk) 16:45, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
References
- ↑ William Lane Craig, & J. P. Moreland, The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology, John Wiley & Sons, 2009. p 602
- ↑ John Wesley Etheridge, Horæ Aramaicæ, Simpkin, Marshall Pub, 1843. p 96
- ↑ Irenaeus, Against Heresies 3.1.1
- ↑ A.Roberts, "Ante-Nicene Fathers", Hendrickson, 1995. vol 1, p 414
- ↑ James R. Edwards, The Hebrew Gospel and the development of the Synoptic Tradition, Eerdmans Publishing, 2009. p 265
- ↑ Edward Williams Byron Nicholson,The Gospel according to the Hebrews, C.K. Paul & co., 1879. pp 2 - 3
- ↑ Hippolytus, On the Twelve Apostles 1.6
- ↑ A.Roberts, "Ante-Nicene Fathers", Hendrickson, 1995. vol 5 p 255
- ↑ James R. Edwards, The Hebrew Gospel and the development of the Synoptic Tradition, Eerdmans Publishing, 2009. p 267
- ↑ Hippolytus, The Extant Works And Fragments Of Hippolytus, Kessinger Publishing, 1886. >> REPRINT >> BiblioBazaar, 2004. p 166
- ↑ Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History, 6.25.4
- ↑ Editorial board, The Fathers of the Church: A New Translation,Catholic University Press, 1969. Vol 29, p 48
- ↑ James R. Edwards, The Hebrew Gospel and the development of the Synoptic Tradition, Eerdmans Publishing, 2009. p 268
- ↑ Sabine Baring-Gould, The lost and hostile gospels, Publisher Williams and Norgate, 1874. p 120
- ↑ Ephem the Syrian, Comm. on Tatian's Diatessaron
- ↑ Carmel McCarthy, Saint Ephrem's Commentary on Tatian's Diatessaron, Oxford University Press 1993. Vol 2, p 344
- ↑ James R. Edwards, The Hebrew Gospel and the development of the Synoptic Tradition, Eerdmans Publishing, 2009. p 272
- ↑ Józef Kudasiewicz, The Synoptic Gospels Today, Alba House, 1996. p 142
- ↑ Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History 3.24.6
- ↑ Editorial board, The Fathers of the Church: A New Translation,Catholic University Press, 1981. Vol 19, p 174-175
- ↑ James R. Edwards, The Hebrew Gospel and the development of the Synoptic Tradition, Eerdmans Publishing, 2009. p 270
- ↑ Edward Bosworth, Studies in the life of Jesus Christ, YMCA Press, 1909. p 95
- ↑ Epiphanius, Panarion 29.9.4
- ↑ Frank Williams, The Panarion of Epiphanius of Salamis, Brill, 2009. Book I, p 130
- ↑ James R. Edwards, The Hebrew Gospel and the development of the Synoptic Tradition, Eerdmans Publishing, 2009. p 274
- ↑ Edward Williams Byron Nicholson,The Gospel according to the Hebrews, C.K. Paul & co., 1879. p 9
- ↑ Epiphanius, Panarion 30.3.7
- ↑ Frank Williams,The Panarion of Epiphanius of Salamis, Brill, 2009. Book I, p 133
- ↑ James R. Edwards, The Hebrew Gospel and the development of the Synoptic Tradition, Eerdmans Publishing, 2009. p 274
- ↑ Bernhard Pick, Paralipomena: remains of gospels and sayings of Christ, Open court publishing company, 1908. p 15
- ↑ Epiphanius, Panarion 30.6.9
- ↑ Frank Williams, The panarion of Epiphanius of Salamis, Brill, 2009. Book I, p 136
- ↑ James R. Edwards, The Hebrew Gospel and the development of the Synoptic Tradition, Eerdmans Publishing, 2009. p 274
- ↑ Edward Williams Byron Nicholson,The Gospel according to the Hebrews, C.K. Paul & co., 1879. p 10
- ↑ Epiphanius, Panarion 51.4.12
- ↑ Frank Williams, The Panarion of Epiphanius of Salamis, Brill, 1994. Book II, pp 28 - 29
- ↑ James R. Edwards, The Hebrew Gospel and the development of the Synoptic Tradition, Eerdmans Publishing, 2009. p 28 & 278
- ↑ Charles Christian Hennell, An inquiry concerning the origin of Christianity, Smallfield, 1838. p 73
- ↑ Epiphanius, Panarion 51.5.1
- ↑ Frank Williams, The Panarion of Epiphanius of Salamis, Brill, 1994. Book II, pp 28 - 29
- ↑ James R. Edwards, The Hebrew Gospel and the development of the Synoptic Tradition, Eerdmans Publishing, 2009. p 26 & 278
- ↑ Philip R. Amidon, The Panarion of St. Epiphanius, Oxford University Press, 1990. p 178
- ↑ Epiphanius, Panarion 51.5.3
- ↑ Frank Williams, The Panarion of Epiphanius of Salamis, Brill, 1994. Book II, p 29
- ↑ James R. Edwards, The Hebrew Gospel and the development of the Synoptic Tradition, Eerdmans Publishing, 2009. p 278
- ↑ Charles Christian Hennell, An inquiry concerning the origin of Christianity, Smallfield, 1838. p 73
- ↑ Chrysostom, Homilies on Matthew 1.7
- ↑ Philip Schaff, "Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers", Hendrickson, 1995. vol 10 p 3
- ↑ James R. Edwards, The Hebrew Gospel and the development of the Synoptic Tradition, Eerdmans Publishing, 2009. p 278
- ↑ George Prevost, The homilies of S. John Chrysostom, J.H. Parker, 1843. Vol 11, Part 1 p 6
- ↑ Jerome, Against Pelagius 3.2
- ↑ Editorial board, The Fathers of the Church: A New Translation,Catholic University Press, 1965. Vol 53, p 349
- ↑ James R. Edwards, The Hebrew Gospel and the development of the Synoptic Tradition, Eerdmans Publishing, 2009. pp 287 - 288
- ↑ Bernhard Pick, Paralipomena: remains of gospels and sayings of Christ, Open court publishing company, 1908. p 3
- ↑ See also margin of codex 1424 – This was to fulfill what the Lord had spoken by the prophets, “Out of Egypt have I called my Son.”
- ↑ Jerome, On Illustrious Men 3
- ↑ Editorial board, The Fathers of the Church: A New Translation, Catholic University Press, 2008. Vol 100, p 10
- ↑ James R. Edwards, The Hebrew Gospel and the development of the Synoptic Tradition, Eerdmans Publishing, 2009. p 281
- ↑ Bernhard Pick, Paralipomena: remains of gospels and sayings of Christ, Open court publishing company, 1908. p 2
- ↑ Jerome, Commentary on Matthew Preface
- ↑ Editorial board, The Fathers of the Church: A New Translation, Catholic University Press, 2008. Vol 100, p 59
- ↑ James R. Edwards, The Hebrew Gospel and the development of the Synoptic Tradition, Eerdmans Publishing, 2009. p 282
- ↑ Archibald Alexander, The canon of the Old and New Testaments, Princeton Press, 1826. p 178
- ↑ Jerome, Commentary on Matthew 12.13
- ↑ Editorial board, The Fathers of the Church: A New Translation, Catholic University Press, 2008. Vol 117, p 140
- ↑ James R. Edwards, The Hebrew Gospel and the development of the Synoptic Tradition, Eerdmans Publishing, 2009. p 283
- ↑ Bernhard Pick, Paralipomena: remains of gospels and sayings of Christ, Open court publishing company, 1908. p 5
- ↑ Jerome, On Psalm 135
- ↑ Pheme Perkins, Introduction to the Synoptic Gospels, Eerdmans Publishing, 2007 p 199
- ↑ James R. Edwards, The Hebrew Gospel and the development of the Synoptic Tradition, Eerdmans Publishing, 2009. p 284
- ↑ Bernhard Pick, Paralipomena: remains of gospels and sayings of Christ, Open court publishing company, 1908. p 5
- ↑ LETTER 19 A letter of Pope Damasus to Jerome on Matthew 21.9
- ↑ Philip Schaff, Nicene and post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church, Eerdmans, 1989. p 22
- ↑ James R. Edwards, The Hebrew Gospel and the development of the Synoptic Tradition, Eerdmans Publishing, 2009. p 279
- ↑ Henry Wace & Philip Schaff, A Select Library of Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church: St. Jerome: Letters and select works, Christian literature Company, 1893. Vol 6, p 22
- ↑ LETTER 20: A letter of Jerome to Pope Damasus on Matthew 21.9
- ↑ Philip Schaff, Nicene and post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church, Eerdmans, 1989. p 22
- ↑ James R. Edwards, The Hebrew Gospel and the development of the Synoptic Tradition, Eerdmans Publishing, 2009. p 279
- ↑ Bernhard Pick, Paralipomena: remains of gospels and sayings of Christ, Open court publishing company, 1908. p 8
- ↑ Marius Mercator, De Haeresi et Libris Hestorii 4.2
- ↑ James R. Edwards, The Hebrew Gospel and the development of the Synoptic Tradition, Eerdmans Publishing, 2009. p 288