Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2ace7f82ad8b23b

Jump to content

Talk:Hebrew Gospel hypothesis/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Ret.Prof in topic The New Scholarship
Archive 1Archive 2

The New Scholarship

At the turn of the Century, scholars started to take a second look at Papias and many historians are now taking the position that his testimony preserved by Eusebius may "be fairly trustworthy." Blackwell (2010) p 301

Indeed, there has been some serious pushback to "Critical studies showing Papias is untenable." Scholars agree that the Gospel of Matthew was not a translation of the Hebrew Gospel. However, they argue that the Papias note never stated that the Hebrew Gospel was translated into the canonical Gospel of Matthew. Indeed, to say that 'Hebrew Matthew' could not exist because it was never translated into 'canonical Matthew' is a "spurious intellectual argument". The "translation issue" does not call into question the existence of the Hebrew gospel. The Dead Sea Scrolls have shown that Hebrew and Aramaic texts did exist without ever having been translated into Koine Greek. Furthermore, the Dead sea Scrolls show Hebraidi dialecto, can refer to 'vocabulary', or 'vocabulary and style' but never should be translated as 'Koine Greek'. Some scholars have gone so far as to argue that the opposition to the Hebrew Gospel may have its roots in anti-Semitism.

In any event as leading British historian Maurice Casey points out, there can be little doubt as to what Papias meant! "It is genuinely true that the apostle Matthew" compiled the sayings/oracles in a Hebrew language, but each (person) translated/ interpreted them as he was able. There is every reason to believe this. Casey 2010 p 86

Bart Ehrman and James Edwards now support Casey and argue that the Papias tradition "is a testimony that explicitly and credibly traces its own lineage directly back to the disciples of Jesus themselves." Ehrman 2012 pp 98-101 (ie the apostolic fountainhead) "It is in any case very early, within living memory of the apostolic age." James R. Edwards, 2009. pp 2-3

Indeed there can be no denying the striking and incontestable fact that the Apostle Matthew wrote the Hebrew Gospel. The widespread agreement of early sources on a number of points is remarkable and cannot be brushed aside, particularly since discrepancies among these sources regarding other points strongly suggest that they are not, for the most part, simply copying one another. Blackwell (2009) p 602 In total there are more than 75 ancient witnesses who testified to the fact that this Hebrew Gospel was in wide circulation. Twelve of the Early Church Fathers testified that it was written by the Apostle Matthew. No ancient writer either Christian or Non Christian challenged these two facts. Edwards (2009) p 259, p 102 & p 117.


To those cynical of excavations of imaginary strata in an imaginary source document, the external evidence looks like a rock in a weary land. "And indeed, if we go back to the door of that library at Harvard and listen closely, we can hear a few voices insisting that the breadth, consistency and unanimity of the external evidence ought to be taken seriously!" Our challenge is to write an article on this topic from a NPOV - Ret.Prof (talk) 16:45, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

References

  1. William Lane Craig, & J. P. Moreland, The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology, John Wiley & Sons, 2009. p 602
  2. John Wesley Etheridge, Horæ Aramaicæ, Simpkin, Marshall Pub, 1843. p 96
  3. Irenaeus, Against Heresies 3.1.1
  4. A.Roberts, "Ante-Nicene Fathers", Hendrickson, 1995. vol 1, p 414
  5. James R. Edwards, The Hebrew Gospel and the development of the Synoptic Tradition, Eerdmans Publishing, 2009. p 265
  6. Edward Williams Byron Nicholson,The Gospel according to the Hebrews, C.K. Paul & co., 1879. pp 2 - 3
  7. Hippolytus, On the Twelve Apostles 1.6
  8. A.Roberts, "Ante-Nicene Fathers", Hendrickson, 1995. vol 5 p 255
  9. James R. Edwards, The Hebrew Gospel and the development of the Synoptic Tradition, Eerdmans Publishing, 2009. p 267
  10. Hippolytus, The Extant Works And Fragments Of Hippolytus, Kessinger Publishing, 1886. >> REPRINT >> BiblioBazaar, 2004. p 166
  11. Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History, 6.25.4
  12. Editorial board, The Fathers of the Church: A New Translation,Catholic University Press, 1969. Vol 29, p 48
  13. James R. Edwards, The Hebrew Gospel and the development of the Synoptic Tradition, Eerdmans Publishing, 2009. p 268
  14. Sabine Baring-Gould, The lost and hostile gospels, Publisher Williams and Norgate, 1874. p 120
  15. Ephem the Syrian, Comm. on Tatian's Diatessaron
  16. Carmel McCarthy, Saint Ephrem's Commentary on Tatian's Diatessaron, Oxford University Press 1993. Vol 2, p 344
  17. James R. Edwards, The Hebrew Gospel and the development of the Synoptic Tradition, Eerdmans Publishing, 2009. p 272
  18. Józef Kudasiewicz, The Synoptic Gospels Today, Alba House, 1996. p 142
  19. Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History 3.24.6
  20. Editorial board, The Fathers of the Church: A New Translation,Catholic University Press, 1981. Vol 19, p 174-175
  21. James R. Edwards, The Hebrew Gospel and the development of the Synoptic Tradition, Eerdmans Publishing, 2009. p 270
  22. Edward Bosworth, Studies in the life of Jesus Christ, YMCA Press, 1909. p 95
  23. Epiphanius, Panarion 29.9.4
  24. Frank Williams, The Panarion of Epiphanius of Salamis, Brill, 2009. Book I, p 130
  25. James R. Edwards, The Hebrew Gospel and the development of the Synoptic Tradition, Eerdmans Publishing, 2009. p 274
  26. Edward Williams Byron Nicholson,The Gospel according to the Hebrews, C.K. Paul & co., 1879. p 9
  27. Epiphanius, Panarion 30.3.7
  28. Frank Williams,The Panarion of Epiphanius of Salamis, Brill, 2009. Book I, p 133
  29. James R. Edwards, The Hebrew Gospel and the development of the Synoptic Tradition, Eerdmans Publishing, 2009. p 274
  30. Bernhard Pick, Paralipomena: remains of gospels and sayings of Christ, Open court publishing company, 1908. p 15
  31. Epiphanius, Panarion 30.6.9
  32. Frank Williams, The panarion of Epiphanius of Salamis, Brill, 2009. Book I, p 136
  33. James R. Edwards, The Hebrew Gospel and the development of the Synoptic Tradition, Eerdmans Publishing, 2009. p 274
  34. Edward Williams Byron Nicholson,The Gospel according to the Hebrews, C.K. Paul & co., 1879. p 10
  35. Epiphanius, Panarion 51.4.12
  36. Frank Williams, The Panarion of Epiphanius of Salamis, Brill, 1994. Book II, pp 28 - 29
  37. James R. Edwards, The Hebrew Gospel and the development of the Synoptic Tradition, Eerdmans Publishing, 2009. p 28 & 278
  38. Charles Christian Hennell, An inquiry concerning the origin of Christianity, Smallfield, 1838. p 73
  39. Epiphanius, Panarion 51.5.1
  40. Frank Williams, The Panarion of Epiphanius of Salamis, Brill, 1994. Book II, pp 28 - 29
  41. James R. Edwards, The Hebrew Gospel and the development of the Synoptic Tradition, Eerdmans Publishing, 2009. p 26 & 278
  42. Philip R. Amidon, The Panarion of St. Epiphanius, Oxford University Press, 1990. p 178
  43. Epiphanius, Panarion 51.5.3
  44. Frank Williams, The Panarion of Epiphanius of Salamis, Brill, 1994. Book II, p 29
  45. James R. Edwards, The Hebrew Gospel and the development of the Synoptic Tradition, Eerdmans Publishing, 2009. p 278
  46. Charles Christian Hennell, An inquiry concerning the origin of Christianity, Smallfield, 1838. p 73
  47. Chrysostom, Homilies on Matthew 1.7
  48. Philip Schaff, "Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers", Hendrickson, 1995. vol 10 p 3
  49. James R. Edwards, The Hebrew Gospel and the development of the Synoptic Tradition, Eerdmans Publishing, 2009. p 278
  50. George Prevost, The homilies of S. John Chrysostom, J.H. Parker, 1843. Vol 11, Part 1 p 6
  51. Jerome, Against Pelagius 3.2
  52. Editorial board, The Fathers of the Church: A New Translation,Catholic University Press, 1965. Vol 53, p 349
  53. James R. Edwards, The Hebrew Gospel and the development of the Synoptic Tradition, Eerdmans Publishing, 2009. pp 287 - 288
  54. Bernhard Pick, Paralipomena: remains of gospels and sayings of Christ, Open court publishing company, 1908. p 3
  55. See also margin of codex 1424 – This was to fulfill what the Lord had spoken by the prophets, “Out of Egypt have I called my Son.”
  56. Jerome, On Illustrious Men 3
  57. Editorial board, The Fathers of the Church: A New Translation, Catholic University Press, 2008. Vol 100, p 10
  58. James R. Edwards, The Hebrew Gospel and the development of the Synoptic Tradition, Eerdmans Publishing, 2009. p 281
  59. Bernhard Pick, Paralipomena: remains of gospels and sayings of Christ, Open court publishing company, 1908. p 2
  60. Jerome, Commentary on Matthew Preface
  61. Editorial board, The Fathers of the Church: A New Translation, Catholic University Press, 2008. Vol 100, p 59
  62. James R. Edwards, The Hebrew Gospel and the development of the Synoptic Tradition, Eerdmans Publishing, 2009. p 282
  63. Archibald Alexander, The canon of the Old and New Testaments, Princeton Press, 1826. p 178
  64. Jerome, Commentary on Matthew 12.13
  65. Editorial board, The Fathers of the Church: A New Translation, Catholic University Press, 2008. Vol 117, p 140
  66. James R. Edwards, The Hebrew Gospel and the development of the Synoptic Tradition, Eerdmans Publishing, 2009. p 283
  67. Bernhard Pick, Paralipomena: remains of gospels and sayings of Christ, Open court publishing company, 1908. p 5
  68. Jerome, On Psalm 135
  69. Pheme Perkins, Introduction to the Synoptic Gospels, Eerdmans Publishing, 2007 p 199
  70. James R. Edwards, The Hebrew Gospel and the development of the Synoptic Tradition, Eerdmans Publishing, 2009. p 284
  71. Bernhard Pick, Paralipomena: remains of gospels and sayings of Christ, Open court publishing company, 1908. p 5
  72. LETTER 19 A letter of Pope Damasus to Jerome on Matthew 21.9
  73. Philip Schaff, Nicene and post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church, Eerdmans, 1989. p 22
  74. James R. Edwards, The Hebrew Gospel and the development of the Synoptic Tradition, Eerdmans Publishing, 2009. p 279
  75. Henry Wace & Philip Schaff, A Select Library of Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church: St. Jerome: Letters and select works, Christian literature Company, 1893. Vol 6, p 22
  76. LETTER 20: A letter of Jerome to Pope Damasus on Matthew 21.9
  77. Philip Schaff, Nicene and post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church, Eerdmans, 1989. p 22
  78. James R. Edwards, The Hebrew Gospel and the development of the Synoptic Tradition, Eerdmans Publishing, 2009. p 279
  79. Bernhard Pick, Paralipomena: remains of gospels and sayings of Christ, Open court publishing company, 1908. p 8
  80. Marius Mercator, De Haeresi et Libris Hestorii 4.2
  81. James R. Edwards, The Hebrew Gospel and the development of the Synoptic Tradition, Eerdmans Publishing, 2009. p 288

- Ret.Prof (talk) 16:45, 19 July 2013 (UTC)