Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21cb81178955645

Jump to content

Talk:Header-only

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Ecloud in topic Inclusion of external links in the list

Only some parts of Boost are header-only, some others require packaging of binary libraries. --171.66.40.154 (talk) 02:19, 7 November 2008 (UTC) AlfCReply

[edit]

Hello @Nomade040: I saw that you had reinstated items in the list that are external links. Unfortunately you didn't give a reason in your edit summary. I don't know if you're familiar with Wikipedia's guidelines on this? WP:ELLIST says "the lists themselves should not be composed of external links". Lists are intended for helping people navigate around Wikipedia, not to turn it into a directory of web links - see WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Please see WP:BRD for how to move forward from here. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:41, 15 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

The list was filled with links to all kinds of stuff. Looked pretty arbitrary. Per WP:ELLIST, external links are not welcome, and the two internal links were not helpful. I removed the section. Chrisahn (talk) 22:25, 15 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

I think the list of header-only libraries (at least the valid ones) should have been kept and turned into "acceptable" form rather than simply deleted. I.e. it looks like this page might have been more useful a few years ago. And you want citations... how about https://github.com/nothings/stb/blob/master/docs/stb_howto.txt ? I'm thinking of starting another header-only library right now, and the wikipedia article comes up in a google search, but the article currently doesn't have much to say. I'm reluctant to bother adding such links, since it's some hassle, I'm doubtful that linking to github blobs is "acceptable", and with such ruthless editing I wonder if it's a waste of time to add anything to this page at all. Ecloud (talk) 18:57, 12 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Merge into another article?

[edit]

Per Wikipedia:Notability, I propose that this article be merged into another. 104.228.101.152 (talk) 04:54, 22 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Wouldn't it make sense to merge it into the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_(computing) Andreas Fabri (talk) 15:51, 28 December 2021 (UTC)Reply