Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsVisual arts
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
Latest comment: 9 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion
There's no reason to delete a stub article about a notable work of art. The "more sources needed" tag is appropriate and we should be encouraging editors to expand the article, not delete the stub altogether. ----Another Believer(Talk)18:36, 8 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
Also, IF the article was deemed unnecessary at this time, we should just redirect (not delete) the page. We don't delete redirects that serve a purpose. ---Another Believer(Talk)18:38, 8 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
The problem is that this article actually has less content in it than List of paintings by Francis Bacon. It adds absolutely nothing to the encyclopedia. If we changed i back into a redirect the only place that it could possibly be redirect to would be List of paintings by Francis Bacon. The problem is that is basically just a mention, no real discussion of the painting. ~GBfan19:14, 8 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
But if it doesn't get expanded now, it will just sit there. It is better for it to be a red link so that people don't think we have information on the painting. Then when someone is interested in writing an article with some real content about the painting they can. ~GBfan19:29, 8 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
