Talk:HeadBlade
Add topicLatest comment: 15 years ago by Michig in topic Deprodded, coverage found
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the HeadBlade article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | HeadBlade received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
Article cleanup
[edit]This looks like pure spam. If it wasn't for the uncollaborated claim of being listed by Time magazine, I'd PROD it as unnotable. As it is, just just reads like an advert. Requires cleaning up. -- Tivedshambo (talk) 20:59, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
- Much improved now. However, Barryfein has asked me about removing the {{advert}} tag (I see he's done this), so I've requested peer review for an outside opinion. See User talk:Tivedshambo#Headblade -- Tivedshambo (talk) 16:23, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
I see that the peer review was archived, so perhaps this is a stable article. If for no other reason, this is a notable product and article because of its design award. -- Sy / (talk) 12:35, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Deprodded, coverage found
[edit]In addition to the brief TIME coverage linked in the article already, I found the following: Google News found a few articles (San Antonio Express News, Orlando Sentinel), but Google Books found a lot more (, , , , , , ).--Michig (talk) 07:30, 24 August 2010 (UTC)