Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22eabd32c36983d

Jump to content

Talk:Haytor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Jasskurn in topic Rename to Haytor Rocks

Hay Tor or Haytor?

[edit]

There are 725 Google hits for "hay tor" compared to about 102,000 for "haytor". It's also shown as "Haytor" on OS maps, so I suggest the article should be renamed. Any comments? Smalljim 23:59, 13 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Rename if its name is Haytor, then the article should reflect that. EdJogg 11:31, 14 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
Moved I've moved the article and renamed the links that point to it (I suppose not necessary, but...). Thanks. Smalljim 23:18, 19 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

New photo

[edit]

Chris huh's new photo of Haytor is very fine … but I'm concerned about the colouration of the tor caused by the evening light. It looks as if it's made of sandstone, not granite. As such I don't think it's really appropriate for the main photo in the article: it's an artistic photo rather than an encyclopedic one. Any comments?  SMALLJIM  11:22, 31 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Like you say - nice photo but I agree it is not representative of Haytor in particular & granite tors generally --Herby talk thyme 11:37, 31 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
Actually you;re right, i'll put back the other photo that was there. That's clearly made of granite. Chris_huhtalk 12:14, 31 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
I've uploaded a colour-corrected version of the photo (preview size only). Is this perhaps worth using?  SMALLJIM  14:03, 31 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
Looks good to me - nice work --Herby talk thyme 15:25, 31 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Current event?

[edit]

I have removed the "current event" tag, as I can see nothing in the article to justify it. The text mentions a cycling event, but the detail in the source shows that even that isn't until September. -- John of Reading (talk) 21:20, 12 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Would it be this? --RacerX11 Talk to meStalk me 00:27, 13 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Low man

[edit]

Is it worth noting that, climbers especially, divide the tor into two sections? The top higher tor being known as "Haytor" and the larger lower face as "low man".

http://www.javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/DartmoorRoutes/Haytor/Haytor.shtml

http://www.javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/DartmoorRoutes/Haytor/Lowman.shtml

Serpren (talk) 06:51, 26 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Since the name appears in a few other references too, I've added a brief mention of it.  SMALLJIM  13:58, 2 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Rename to Haytor Rocks

[edit]

Article originally named as "hay tor", then renamed to "Haytor" with argument that OS maps named it "Haytor".

OS Maps names it as "Haytor Rocks" Link1 Link2.

The database, Tors of Dartmoor, names it as Haytor Rocks.

The national database, Database of British and Irish Hills, names it as Haytor Rocks

I suggest the article should be renamed to Haytor Rocks. Any comments? Jasskurn (talk) 13:38, 13 September 2022 (UTC)Reply