Talk:Hate mail
Add topic| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Contains a rather dubious claim...
[edit]I'm going to go ahead and delete this part -- and leave the dubious claim. My apologies if anyone feels the need to revert. Chris 16:35, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Re: deletions
[edit]Due to User:213.37.6.65's concerns regarding my deletions, I've tagged the better part of the article with {{fact}}. The tagged items are either in need of sources, vague and unnecessary, or both. I plan to leave the tags up for 48 hours, then remove what hasn't been fixed en masse. Deltabeignet 02:31, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Too short
[edit]This article needs elaboration and bringing up to date. Zezen (talk) 12:15, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
To misappropriate means to steal
[edit]"The text of hate mail often contains profanity, or it may simply contain a negative, misappropriating message."
The word "misappropriating" makes no sense in this sentence, but I didn't correct it because I don't know what word was intended. If no one else wants to correct it, I'll come back and delete it. Whaledancer (talk) 17:44, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
- C-Class Philately articles
- Low-importance Philately articles
- All WikiProject Philately pages
- C-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- C-Class psychology articles
- Low-importance psychology articles
- WikiProject Psychology articles
- C-Class Crime-related articles
- Low-importance Crime-related articles
- WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
- C-Class sociology articles
- Low-importance sociology articles