Talk:Hartree
Add topicLatest comment: 19 years ago by Dekimasu in topic Requested move
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hartree article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Shouldn't this article be retitled "Hartree Unit"? Because Hartree energy is a calculated absolute energy for an atom/molecule.
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was move the page from Hartree energy to Hartree, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 07:20, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
It should be moved simply to Hartree, which currently redirects here. This is what has been done for other units such as Newton, Joule, and Kelvin. --Itub 12:37, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Support move to simpler name per nominator's reasoning. --Polaron | Talk 05:20, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
- Concur, per naming conventions and basic logic. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 23:27, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.