Talk:Harmonization
Add topic | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Advertising?
[edit]Should there really be links, in References, to pages that are offering guitar courses for sale? That's effectively an advertising link, isn't it? Is that allowed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.45.59.166 (talk) 03:33, 2 September 2008
Tf
[edit]Who tf wrote this?? It’s missing some verbs 62.192.163.37 (talk) 15:54, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
Assessment
[edit]This would be a Bad article, if such a grade existed. Why should a Harmonization article begin with a section about Reharmonization? The basic concept is poorly explained at the outset.Trumpetrep (talk) 19:21, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
Removed unclear text on coda/bridge relation
[edit]Here is the text I removed from the “reharmonization” section:
Another common use of reharmonization is to introduce a new section in the music, such as a coda or bridge.
If anyone understands the point, please clarify this text to more clearly explain how “form” sections such as coda/bridge relate to reharmonization. ~2025-37724-58 (talk) 13:24, 28 December 2025 (UTC)