Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23d66f289a6efe9

Jump to content

Talk:Half cent

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 months ago by Jeffrey34555 in topic Requested move 7 May 2026

Nicknames

[edit]

Was this coin ever referred to by the nickname for the British analogue, ha'penny? --Xyzzyva 03:15, 14 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have never seen or heard it referred to as such in any modern numismatic literature. MatthewM (talk) 22:07, 19 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Everyone I know calls them "heypennies"...2601:806:4301:C100:715E:F0D4:544A:F17B (talk) 23:02, 15 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Really worth a dime?

[edit]

The article mentions how the coin is similar in worth to the current dime. How true is that though? I've heard plenty of stories (accurate ones) of items like a whole pizza costing 5 to 10 cents. That's 10 to 20 half-cent coins. You certainly can not buy a pizza for $1-2. So is it really similar in worth to a dime? Not sure I agree with that. Seems more like the worth in the range of $0.50-$1 than anything else.

10:44, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Even low grade specimens for relatively common half cents are worth around $25 or more. MatthewM (talk) 22:04, 30 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

MatthewM: the issue isn't current collectors-value. It's a question of how much purchasing power the coin had. 128.197.11.28 (talk) 15:44, 6 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

sorry for accidently reverting your edits I still need to get used to the huggle update

Alexnia (T) @ 09:46, 9 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

What years are the comparison suppose to be? 1843 and 2004, 1799-1976 etc it should be deleted if no reference is provided. Enlil Ninlil (talk) 04:21, 4 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wasn't it produced after 1857? Seems I saw the New York Times priced at a half-cent in the 1890s. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.16.198.152 (talk) 07:44, 22 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Due to rising copper costs and unpopularity, the mint stopped production in 1857. --Coingeek (talk) 01:48, 9 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

No half cents-1837?

[edit]

I know there were none in 1837, but I read in The Red Book that merchants issued private tokens in 1837, should this be in the article, and is it possible to obtain a picture of it? --Coingeek (talk) 01:48, 9 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thickness=???

[edit]

Really? Does no one know how thick a half-cent coin is?98.101.136.218 (talk) 20:11, 2 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thickness at 20 mm? This has to be a typo! No way this coin as as thick as it is wide.75.250.152.180 (talk) 00:25, 4 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Stub Tag

[edit]

Does this article qualify as a stub? it is very light in content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.163.58.231 (talk) 01:53, 8 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

5 Mill = 1/2 cent

[edit]

Should the two articles be connected in some way?--Ant2242 (talk) 18:26, 12 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 7 May 2026

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 03:42, 14 May 2026 (UTC)Reply


Half cent (United States coin)Half cent – The basename half cent has redirected here for about 20 years, indicating this is the primary topic for the base name, so the article should exist there per WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT. The other topics are already disambiguated via a hatnote, and the United States coin receives about 100 times the page views as half-cent coin (Netherlands) and was minted earlier. This case was mentioned by Mathguy2718 at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2026_April_12#Timeline_of_X as an example where this WP:MISPLACED status quo is advantageous, but I disagree. The only other option would be to create a disambiguation page at the base name; the status quo is as if we can't decide whether there is a primary topic or not...so let's decide. Mdewman6 (talk) 18:09, 7 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

  • adding a comment: I did some quick research around to see if there were any notable coins called "half cent" that just didn't have an article yet, but none seem to have the coverage that the US coin does. So yeah, obviously primary topic. support per nom. Eman7blue42 (talk page | recent edits) 22:28, 9 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.