Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a254b2e3a9ca36cd

Jump to content

Talk:Hail Larry

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by SL93 in topic Did you know nomination

Redirected to 2015–16 NFL playoffs#NFC: Arizona Cardinals 26, Green Bay Packers 20 (OT)

[edit]

Per the discussion here Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Football League#Thoughts on Hail Larry, I redirected this article to 2015–16 NFL playoffs#NFC: Arizona Cardinals 26, Green Bay Packers 20 (OT). « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:05, 15 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

GA review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Hail Larry/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 20:00, 4 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: History6042 (talk · contribs) 02:39, 11 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hey, @Gonzo fan2007: I will do this review. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:39, 11 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Comments

[edit]

Images all have captions where needed. Also none of them need fair use rationals. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:41, 11 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

There is no edit warring. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:43, 11 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
Article also doesn't seem objectionably biased. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:46, 11 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
The article has the right level of detial, not too much, not too little for what I would except in a game article. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:56, 11 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
I'll choose 5 random sources to spotcheck, 2, 14, 4, 7, and 25. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:58, 11 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
2 passes. History6042😊 (Contact me) 03:00, 11 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
14 does provide an example about analasys being mostly near the end. History6042😊 (Contact me) 03:01, 11 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
4 passes. History6042😊 (Contact me) 03:03, 11 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
7 passes. History6042😊 (Contact me) 03:04, 11 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
25 passes as does the whole spotcheck. History6042😊 (Contact me) 03:05, 11 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
Earwig finds no issues. History6042😊 (Contact me) 03:06, 11 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
I fixed all grammar issues myself. This is a very good article and I will pass it. History6042😊 (Contact me) 03:15, 11 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 03:51, 9 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Improved to Good Article status by Gonzo fan2007 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 66 past nominations.

« Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:37, 11 March 2025 (UTC).Reply

Tenpop421 ALT1: ... that during the Hail Larry game, Green Bay Packers wide receiver Jeff Janis recorded 145 of his career total of 345 receiving yards and 2 of his 3 career touchdowns? « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 20:22, 12 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
Works for me! Hook is short enough, interesting, in article, and cited. Good to go. Tenpop421 (talk) 21:10, 12 March 2025 (UTC)Reply