Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a221615e2c7490ce

Jump to content

Talk:Hack writer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 years ago by 2603:8001:D3F0:87E0:0:0:0:1DF6 in topic this page needs to define "hackwork"; and it's not simply "by hack writers"

[Untitled]

[edit]

Under the examples of hack writers in fiction, a fictional writer who turns to prositution in order to support himself is listed, that isn't an example of being a hack writer, becuase there is no writing involved, which is why I removed it. --24.116.228.9 (talk) 23:26, 5 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Explain why the example of Sunset Boulevard is an example of a fictional hack. Explain it to me! I will keep removing it untill I get an explaination. It is not an example of a hack, when a writer turns to literal prostituion! Article Reverted. No explaination of why that is an example of a hack writer in fiction provided. --24.116.228.9 (talk) 22:45, 6 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

this page needs to define "hackwork"; and it's not simply "by hack writers"

[edit]

Edna St. Vincent Millay is not considered a hackwriter (first woman to win the Pulitzer Prize), but her page says she did "hackwork" under a pseudonym (she may have used the term herself), and hackwork redirects to this page. I presume it means writing that's "not challenging" (artistically, socially, politically) and meant to appeal to a mass audience. So, I think this page should have a separate section for hackwork to make some distinction like that; otherwise it makes no sense to get redirected here 2603:8001:D3F0:87E0:0:0:0:1DF6 (talk) 21:13, 2 January 2024 (UTC)Reply