Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2353fe41fa05751

Jump to content

Talk:HMS Radiant

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Dfvj in topic Still afloat in 2000?

Confusion regarding Chumphon memorial

[edit]

Just to reiterate: the vessel preserved at Chumphon (10°23′54″N 99°16′45″E / 10.39833°N 99.27917°E / 10.39833; 99.27917) is the 1930's era Italian-built torpedo boat HMTS Chumphon, not HMTS Phra Ruang (ex-HMS Radiant). This can be most readily confirmed by looking at the preserved vessel on Google Maps street view: her appearance is quite different from an R-Class destroyer, with one large trunked funnel, not three small ones; it conforms closely to the appearance of HMTS Chumphon shown in standard references.Dfvj (talk) 05:09, 25 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

The following sentence was deleted Dec 9 2018: "It is reported that she remained in use as a training hulk and as of 2000 was still afloat, but has since been moved ashore and encased in concrete at a shrine to Admiral Prince Abhakara Kiartivongse.[1]".

There is no details of this vessel being preserved in concrete at the cited reference; there is a HMTS Chumphon (a 1930's era torpedo boat) preserved in concrete at Chumphon as a memorial to Prince Abhakara Kiartivongse [2], (and this is mis-identified as HMTS Pra Ruang at various places on the web).  Preceding unsigned comment added by Dfvj (talkcontribs) 00:47, 10 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for making the corrections and keeping an eye on the article. It appears to be quite a common confusion, such that there's a 2003 article in the Royal Thai Naval Institute's journal explicitly trying to correct the confusion. I'd also point out that the prefix HTMS, as you previously wrote in the above comment, is correct. --Paul_012 (talk) 15:19, 25 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for correcting the typo.Dfvj (talk) 16:56, 25 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. "PHRA RUANG destroyer". Navypedia. Retrieved 23 September 2016.
  2. "Chumphon South Beaches: Had Sai Ree". Retrieved 9 December 2018.

Still afloat in 2000?

[edit]

Is Navypedia considered a reliable source? The claim seems rather dubious, especially since I couldn't find any Thai sources reporting on this. --Paul_012 (talk) 15:22, 25 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

I've added a footnote to clarify the situation.Dfvj (talk) 17:36, 25 November 2019 (UTC)Reply