Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a29d4e6a892ec526

Jump to content

Talk:HMS Lizard (1757)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Ultimograph5 in topic GA Review
Good articleHMS Lizard (1757) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 19, 2018Good article nomineeListed
May 13, 2026WikiProject A-class reviewNot approved
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Lizard (1757)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ultimograph5 (talk · contribs) 21:00, 19 February 2018 (UTC)Reply


Review beginning. Ultimograph5 (talk) 21:00, 19 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. Very well written article, definitely above standard.
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. All MoS guidelines met.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. Good references provided.
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). Reliable sources.
2c. it contains no original research. None found.
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. None found.
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. Addresses all main aspects.
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). Article is a perfect size for the subject, doesn't go into unnecessary detail.
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. Appears neutral.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Stable article.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. Images properly tagged.
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. Image choice is exceptionally good.
7. Overall assessment. This article is well above standard for Good Article, nearly at Featured Article standard.