Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a236ac7ecf21d287

Jump to content

Talk:HMCS Corner Brook

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 7 months ago by Eseifanium in topic Power output figure is incorrect

News article

[edit]

HMCS Corner Brook approaches aircraft carrier undetected

http://www.forces.gc.ca/site/community/mapleleaf/article_e.asp?id=3627

Crew list

[edit]

No one found it a little bit odd that the entire crew of an active-duty warship is listed by rank, full name and position on an open-source website? OPSEC anyone? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.202.223.202 (talk) 15:28, 22 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

The Canadian Forces has already seen fit to make that information public, in the 'Sub Departments' pages of the submarine's webpages at http://www.navy.forces.gc.ca/cornerbrook/3/3-s_eng.asp?category=67&title=773 . Assuming that the information there is true, if they want to make the information public /there/, I see no reason for us to conceal it /here/. DataPacRat (talk) 22:17, 28 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

There is concern that lists of commanding officers for warships/submarines do not belong, as the information adds very little to the understanding of the subject at hand (in this case, HMCS Corner Brook). If lists of COs are 'maybe', I think that lists of the entire boat's company would be a solid 'no' under WP:What Wikipedia is not, particularly "Not an indiscriminate collection of information", point 5, and "Not a directory", point 7. -- saberwyn 04:57, 14 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Location

[edit]

User:Indefatigable has stated in his /her edit summary: "St John's is not on the Labrador coast." I put that bit in , wrongly it would seem, to try and help the reader know where St Johns is. If it is wrong, Indefatigable, how about correcting it? RASAM (talk) 21:47, 16 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

With St John's being the capital of the province, I did not think its location needed elaboration, especially since it is hyperlinked and in a photo caption, which should be kept brief. But if we do decide to elaborate, what should we put? Avalon Peninsula would not work -- if you know where that is, you probably already know where St John's is. "Eastern Newfoundland" is probably the best we can do. Indefatigable (talk) 22:17, 18 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on HMCS Corner Brook (SSK 878). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:49, 13 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on HMCS Corner Brook (SSK 878). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:39, 14 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on HMCS Corner Brook. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:09, 17 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Power output figure is incorrect

[edit]

The power output of the sub is not 37 MW. That amounts to almost 50,000 bhp. No way two diesel engines on a sub can produce that much power. It's probably closer to 3.7 MW. Eseifanium (talk) 10:02, 30 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Great, bring sources to correct the info. Otherwise, your suppositions are just that, supposition. 13:13, 30 December 2025 (UTC)