Talk:HIV/GA2
Add topicGA Reassessment
[edit]This reassessment was terminated by me because it is not consistent with the intention of WP:GAR and did not follow appropriate procedures. This discussion is preserved only as a record of the actions that were taken. hamiltonstone (talk) 02:54, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Please see Talk:HIV#HIV_Risk_Table which, I think, is a major issue. Phoenix of9 06:01, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- Also looking at HIV#Sexual, there seems to be strong heterosexism. Eg: Parts about circumcision ignore information such as this: Phoenix of9 06:23, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- No problems with the table. Correctly cited with numbers that may be old, but are still best estimates. Heterosexism is your POV. That section is also written and cited correctly. --Bob (talk) 21:45, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- I've waited a few days but noone addressed my concerns. Bob, not only the numbers are old, but they are also contradicted by newer research. Phoenix of9 00:22, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
Phoenix, as an uninvolved editor, but with a lot of experience at GA, this does not look like an appropriate course of action. Please see Wikipedia:Good article reassessment - it does not look like you have acted consistent with this process. Do not delist. This should either be a community GAR or a talk page issue (where I see the issues are being discussed). If you delist, I will immediately commence a process to reverse that action. hamiltonstone (talk) 01:31, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- I now see Phoenix has attempted to close this as a delist. These actions will be reverted. Phoenix, if you have an issue, discuss it at WP:GAR or on the project's talk page, where I have left a notice. hamiltonstone (talk) 01:36, 30 March 2010 (UTC)