Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a252859dee6f4c41

Jump to content

Talk:HCV genotypes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): SSASHWIN. Peer reviewers: Dimah Almahbub, Inbornone, Albahrani Batool.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:04, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Peer Review

[edit]

The introduction of the disease gives a concise and clear idea about the disease and reflects the most important reasons related to the disease, but I have some comments to improve your article. You mentioned the disease symptoms at the end of the first section and the third. I suggest creating a new title for the disease symptoms. this will organize the article and makes the information easy to find. There are a few of grammar mistakes, such as In the first paragraph, you write Symptoms associated with the disease will not occur usually. You can put the adverb before the verb The second section you write the word WHO in the capital letter! Finally, in disease treatment section you repeated the word For in two sentences consecutive. I prefer to change the word. I hope that my remarks will be useful for the development of content.Albahrani Batool (talk) 20:51, 7 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the commentsSSASHWIN (talk) 22:51, 7 March 2017 (UTC)Reply


Peer review

[edit]

Overall, everything seems very good. Your articles are simple and well detailed in the same time. Most of your references are current which is good too. The only point that I think you have to work on is using hyperlinks for webpages in the references, make sure that's ok because I havent seen hyperlinks in wiki page's references before.

Thank you very much for your commentsSSASHWIN (talk) 23:53, 10 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Peer viewer#

[edit]


Overall this looks very seful addition to the current HCV genotypes. The Geographical distribution of HCV subtypes is a good add to show the data in a clear way . I would recommend to link the techniques to other Wikipedia so if the reader need more information. other than that every thing looks clear and organized  Preceding unsigned comment added by Hakmatnujoom (talkcontribs) 01:31, 11 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thank you so much for the useful commentsSSASHWIN (talk) 23:18, 11 March 2017 (UTC)Reply