Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2260fe8ee91a53e

Jump to content

Talk:Gyration tensor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 18 years ago by WillowW in topic Potential misunderstanding

Potential misunderstanding

[edit]

In the last part of the article describing asphericity and acylindricity: the statements about the particles' distributions could be incorrectly interpreted.

Zero asphericity implies the moment of inertia tensor is spherically symmetric but the particle distribution need-not be and indeed can't really be for a finite number of particles.

Similarly with zero acylindricity.

Specifically a cubic volume of gas shouldn't be said to be either spherically or cylindrically symmetric yet it will have zero asphericity and acylindricity.

It's a minor point but the wording could actually lead to false assumptions so it might be better to change these statements about the particles to ones about the actual moment of inertia tensor.

Regards, Jambaugh (talk) 19:57, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks very much, J! :) I'd missed that potential misunderstanding. I've tried to fix it up; please let me know if you think it's OK — thanks! :) Willow (talk) 07:45, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply