Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a236882c1f7e7929

Jump to content

Talk:Gurn

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 month ago by ~2026-18835-43 in topic Famous non contest gurners

Inappropriate Picture

[edit]

Yeanold Viskersenn (talk · contribs) is insisting that the picture Image:Man grimacing.jpg should be a part of this article. I completely disagree (and so has 82.44.21.74 (talk · contribs)). The photo's colouration is not appropriate for an article that is not about flourescent colours. I would be satisfied if the photo were replaced with a version that had not been colourized like this (either a black & white photo or a normal colour photo).

In order to avoid the edit war that seems to be developing over this, I am asking for other wikipedians to state their views here so that we can come to a consensus on this.

GrantNeufeld 00:47, 21 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

I am sometimes amazed by the pedanticity that occurs on this website. If the colours are really that distracting and corruptive of the article's credibility, then a simple desaturation of the existing image will bring it to the seemingly personally preferred (unless there are Wikipedia guidelines about colouration, I'm unsure) specifications that GrantNeufeld has described. Feel free to edit and re-upload the image as you wish. In the meantime I see no harm in retaining the existing photo, as a fluorescent image is more useful than no image at all. Yeanold Viskersenn 01:39, 21 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Inaccurate picture

[edit]

I think this image should be removed because it is inaccurate. The article states that a gurn "involves projecting the lower jaw as far forward and up as possible, and covering the upper lip with the lower lip." The person in the photo isn't doing anything resembling that. It looks more like a frown to me. --Donbert 23:06, 14 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

I agree heartedly. This picture does not appear to illustrate what the text is saying. I think we should take it out. Ke6jjj 01:01, 29 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
One more vote from me, for removing the picture. For an informative article, what one thinks of as an almost stereotypical gurn would be much better. In fact, the person in the picture doesn't appear to be participating in the tradition of gurning, per se. 71.201.84.75 22:24, 30 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
Me also. The mental picture I get from the article (and my own expression when I attempt the face) doesn't resemble that picture whatsoever. I imagine it's more like that Hallmark card which I can't seem to find a picture of anywhere online, with that old frontier-looking guy on it. DevOhm Talk 00:51, 13 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
Removed it. This picture is clearly not a depiction of gurning, and there is obvious consensus to remove it. Fences and windows (talk) 22:34, 13 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
At right is the removed image.
An adult human not gurning
Contrary to what Donbert says above, the article states "A typical gurn might involve projecting the projecting the lower jaw[...]" (emphasis added). It seems like article text has been corrected since the complaint was made and that was the proper course of action. There are two other images on the page, so I won't bother restoring that one, but this picture seems fine to me. --Elijah (talk) 20:16, 14 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Better pictures

[edit]

What about these? // Liftarn (talk) 13:02, 4 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Duck Face

[edit]

Duck Face redirects here and i do not believe it should. Δρ∈rs∈ghiη (talk) 21:43, 7 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Redirects and colloquialisms

[edit]

since making a face, and duck face, redirect here, there needs to be mention of these terms in article, esp. of their origin status, ie are they yank or brit english. oy, i added info on the yank version. hope its both swell and bloody useful, mates.50.193.19.66 (talk) 17:27, 6 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

In the US projecting the lips to appear fuller, or using fillers, or silicone to do so is called "Duck Face". Folks with extreme enlargement of lips with fillers, especially combined with use of other implants, and fillers for sex appeal, are called "Bimbo Goon". The similarity of the sound "goon" to "gurn" may be an origin connection. I'm doubtful there are published sources for it. ~2026-18835-43 (talk) 11:21, 20 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Gurning as I know it

[edit]

In Canada, gurning is when someone with no teeth does this, even getting their bottom lip over their nose. Here's what I suggest:

  • Make that bit about toothless gurning into a section.
  • Get an image of this sort of gurning into that section.

Okay, who reading this has no teeth and is not camera shy? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:01, 27 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Famous non contest gurners

[edit]

John Lennon was noted for gurning. That's published. Irish comedian Jimmy Carr gurned frequently in the past. Gurning is a common tic of some folks with Tourette's syndrome. ~2026-18835-43 (talk) 11:35, 20 June 2026 (UTC)Reply