Talk:Gulfstream V
Add topicLatest comment: 1 year ago by Avi8tor in topic Poorly written
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gulfstream V article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Poorly written
[edit]The following is poorly written: "It has a new semi supercritical wing for a fuel capacity of 41,000–12,000 lb (18.6–5.4 t) more than the G-IV", this does not make sense. Unless you make it "It has a new semi supercritical wing with a fuel capacity of 41,000 lb (19 t), which is 12,000 lb (5.4 t) more than the G-IV." The source is only available with a paid subscription so I cannot check the actual figures. Avi8tor (talk) 08:03, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class aviation articles
- C-Class aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class military aviation articles
- Military aviation task force articles
- C-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- C-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles