Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21d7c859804f8ab

Jump to content

Talk:Guideposts

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Karenthewriter in topic Editing article

[Untitled]

[edit]

yes, the 'guidepost' is an advertising/exposure article for a magazine.

what would be the article for 'playboy' ?

this is a response to a link on the 'guidepost' page to suggest a separate area within this great site to identify such information for periodicals/magazines/print articles. perhaps a single quote would segregate the items ?

68.97.250.198 19:25, 28 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Reference note # 4 goes to an advertisement. I'm deleting it. Rags (talk) 09:45, 30 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

I am also replacing some info deleted in an effort to elim "bias". I am all for NPOV. Please rewrite, instead of deleting. Thanks. Rags (talk) 10:45, 30 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

ISSN

[edit]

What is the ISSN of the magazine? 68.48.113.58 (talk) 20:14, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Editing article

[edit]

I plan to do a major edit of the article, since it is now tagged as reading like an advertisement. I'm considering deleting the names and descriptions of the numerous devotionals and Bible resources, and just state that there are many available. Does anyone have an objection to that? It may be worth while to list the names of all of the magazines now published, though I don't know if I can find a source for that, other than the Guidepost website. Karenthewriter (talk) 07:43, 5 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

No objection from me to the deletions - they read directory-like at the moment and are unsourced. Thanks for taking this on. Tacyarg (talk) 07:56, 5 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
Though I did not enjoy doing so I just deleted close to half of the article. Much of it read as advertising, and most was not referenced. I was able to add several additional sources, plus I left a few unreferenced sentences because I didn't have the heart to remove everything that was problematic. I spent a couple hours looking for good references, but found few sources beyond the official Guideposts website and some bloggers, and those weren't acceptable by Wikipedia standards. Karenthewriter (talk) 00:00, 6 September 2023 (UTC)Reply