Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2403ca0dc6007d6

Jump to content

Talk:Guangming Daily

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 months ago by Deroue in topic Title calligraphy

Requested move 13 July 2017

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved - WP:SNOW decision.   Amakuru (talk) 14:23, 18 July 2017 (UTC)Reply



Guangming Daily (China)Guangming Daily – per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC and WP:TWODABS:

1. Circulation. The Chinese paper is one of the country's most important national papers, once one of China's "big three", with a circulation of 1.5 million in 1987. Its most recent circulation is 490,000, comparable to 571,500 for The New York Times. I don't have the data for the Malaysian paper, but its target audience is the ethnic Chinese population in Malaysia, which numbers about 10 million, less than 1% of China's population.

2. Web traffic. Alexa ranks the Chinese paper's website (gmw.cn) as the 73rd busiest in the world, and 14th busiest in China . The Malaysia newspaper's website ranks 78,776th in the world, and 586th in Malaysai .

3. Long-term significance. The Chinese paper has been extremely important in Chinese politics, heavily involved in the ending of the Cultural Revolution and the victory of Deng Xiaoping over Hua Guofeng. Its articles are intensely studied by scholars. For example, it is cited many times in The Cambridge History of China. I don't see any comparable influence from the Malaysian paper.

-Zanhe (talk) 02:44, 13 July 2017 (UTC)Reply


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:21, 18 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:07, 1 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Title calligraphy

[edit]

Does anyone know who wrote the title characters? Mao? Deroue (talk) 03:05, 7 March 2026 (UTC)Reply