Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a225fd913ce8a3ae

Jump to content

Talk:Ground start

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Tuxd00d in topic Copyright

Timely clearing?

[edit]

The article states "PBXs work best on ground start trunks because those trunks can give them an on hook signal allowing for timely clearing". Why does ground start provide more timely clearing than loop start? Is this an issue with disconnect supervision? --Brouhaha (talk) 05:52, 14 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Clearing Sequence

[edit]

The sentence that says the central office removes the short doesn't make sense, as it was the PBX that applied it in the first place. Also one can attempt to clear form either side and it is not clear which case applies here. Without any sources, I'm reluctant to try and fix this. David Woolley (talk) 17:55, 9 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Start Sequence

[edit]

The start sequence the article describes doesn't seem possible. It says that the PBX shorts the pair together and grounds it to seize the line. But then it says that the PBX senses a voltage difference across the pair before it releases the ground start. The problem is, if the PBX has the pair shorted then no voltage difference can exist across it for the PBX to sense and thus the PBX would never release the ground start. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.59.100.223 (talk) 03:02, 19 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

The content is substantially identical to http://www.tech-faq.com/ground-start.html. Who was the original author of the content?

--Tuxd00d (talk) 07:14, 31 March 2017 (UTC)Reply