Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a239e975e9e24bba

Jump to content

Talk:Greg James

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 months ago by MilesQuestBack in topic Citations

Merger proposal

[edit]

The page Flash Flash doesn't really warrant it's own page. I suggest it's incorporated with this one. --drak2 (talk) 21:53, 21 June 2008 (UTC)Reply


Yes, I agree. Veggiehead (talk) 12:30, 22 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

sounds good. someone just do it, wiki is free for all to edit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sirjames04 (talkcontribs) 13:52, 25 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Tone of the Article

[edit]

Ok, so I know 'Tone' is a bit of a arty word.. but, the majority of this article does not do Greg or his show as much justice as it deserves! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.217.0.154 (talk) 04:15, 7 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Personal life

[edit]

If you can find a source about him marrying ellie Goulding, put that in. The dating bit is unsourced.188.141.24.232 (talk) 22:13, 10 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

BBC vandalism

[edit]

Vandalism mentioned on BBC Radio 1 by Ferne Cotton including the addition of "Honeybunch" and "Under 16's Morris Dancing" by IP 132.185.144.124, registered to the BBC. 89.243.65.28 (talk) 10:04, 28 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. There appears to be no argument against this being the primary topic by Wikipedia's standards. Cúchullain t/c 16:02, 11 February 2013 (UTC)Reply



– Clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. 16,000 hits per month compared to 250 for the judge. 82.132.218.89 (talk) 20:42, 11 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

It might also be worth pointing out tht the user that made the change was blocked on 31 January as seen at User talk:Onlythetruthisappropriate. Zarcadia (talk) 10:09, 3 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Proposal for section move

[edit]

Hello, similar to other show articles such as Fearne Cotton and Scott Mills, I propose that the 'radio show' section of this article which features information about Greg's Radio 1 show should be moved into a new article, Greg James (radio show). The majority of this section is not biographical content that belongs on a personal article, but more content about the show itself which does not yet have its own article - and the show is certainly notable enough for one. I am happy to do this move and create this article as long as this proposal is uncontroversial - I'll do it soon if there are no objections. Thanks -BZTMPS · (talk? contribs?) 01:33, 1 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Due to the lack of controversy, this has now been  Done --BZTMPS · (talk? contribs?) 18:35, 4 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Greg James. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:33, 24 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Merge podcast into article

[edit]

The podcast does not have enough coverage to be considered notable so I'm recommending it be merged with this article. He is the host and the topic seems most relevant to him, there's already a small section dedicated to the topic. TipsyElephant (talk) 01:07, 14 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

You have neglected to link the podcast: That's What He Said Podcast. That article looks unreasonably detailed for a podcast of dubious notability, and a major trim and merge may well be called for. The trimming needed might be so extensive that it should be raised in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Verbcatcher (talk) 08:54, 10 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
Oppose: Way too long of an article to be merged --FMSky (talk) 23:40, 9 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Halitosis?

[edit]

Surely this is a complete lie? 2A00:23C7:1192:5701:75F7:2F33:B188:E716 (talk) 18:50, 31 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Citations

[edit]

I've just been putting a couple of citations in. There are quite a few statements without citations. I've added two. But I don't want to clutter up the article with citations! I've been factchecking the statements and they all seem completely accurate, just not all overly cited. I will go through tomorrow or the next day and have a look! But please let me know if the article is fine as it is. Cheers! MilesQuestBack (talk) 23:17, 22 January 2026 (UTC)Reply