Talk:Greenfield status

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Comment by anon

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This was added to the article by 81.98.152.248:

This is the wrong way around, at least in the UK. It is the brownfield sites that have been 
redeveloped, greenfield sites and the green belt are as yet untouched or agricultural land. 
There's always a massive opposition to their development due to the destruction of the environment.

I'm not sure if this is correct, but I thought it warranted moving to the Talk page. --Clay Collier 23:24, 22 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

This is definitely not correct. Also, it does not correspond to the German Version of the Article. Needs to be corrected! S.Waldburger

165.72.200.11 (talk) 10:05, 4 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Greenfield status

Comment by anon