Talk:Greene Man
Add topicLatest comment: 2 years ago by Edwardx in topic Standardisation
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Greene Man article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | A fact from Greene Man appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 December 2019 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
| A fact from Greene Man appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 December 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Standardisation
[edit]Proposing to ‘move’ so that the borough name is used in the title. This seems to be the standard.AlasdairDaw (talk) 17:23, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:PRECISION. The claimed standard does not exist and would not be a good one. In this case, the place is not considered to be in Camden and is nowadays considered to be in the Euston district. The borough is a local government artifact which does not correspond well with such London districts. The borough of Camden is a comparatively recent creation (1965) while this place goes back centuries. Such complexities would tend to cause conflict and confusion and are not needed as there isn't currently a problem requiring fixing. Andrew🐉(talk) 22:02, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Not needed. No such standard exists. AlasdairDaw should familiarise themselves with Wikipedia:Disambiguation. Edwardx (talk) 10:40, 28 September 2023 (UTC)