Talk:Gratification
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gratification article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
On July 28th this page was nominated for VfD. The result was unanimous keep. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Gratification. Redwolf24 01:36, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
The survey link can be moved to references
[edit]The survey link mentioned in the last paragraph seems to be for good research. But, it provides very general feedback. The link seems more like an advertisement. I think we can do away with the link. Or, include it in the references than the main article itself.
--AmolNil (talk) 11:25, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
I agree. That paragraph does not seem to fit in the article.
Get rid of "examples"
[edit]I move to get rid of these two sentences:
- This focus may be due in part to the influence of utilitarianism, the consequentialist belief that morality can be measured by the overall yield of happiness (utility) that results from a particular action. One example of a significant influence of this theory is the importance of cost-benefit analysis in Western economic theory.
The first is only a common misunderstanding of utilitarianism ("greatest satisfaction to greatest number" says nothing about now vs. later). The second sounds extremely speculative and I can't imagine how one would go about citing a reference.
Some mention of utilitarianism and CBA might belong in this article, but as it stands now it adds nothing.