Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2285520b94ec6f8

Jump to content

Talk:Graham number

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 years ago by CaptMalR in topic Cautionary note required

Section about origin/history/theory?

[edit]

Would a section that described the theory behind why buying below the Graham number would be considered good be appropriate?.. Or would that be too POV.. (meaning, "is the whys of this generally discussed in micro/macro-econ textbooks?)

(Useless humorous quip: I got to this page from the other Graham number page.. Buying below that Graham number would most certainly be considered a good thing!) --Jimw338 (talk) 03:23, 27 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Cautionary note required

[edit]

Before being checked against the Graham Number, Benjamin Graham required that a stock first meet 6 other Qualitative Defensive criteria.

Using The Graham Number Correctly discusses the issue in detail.

I highly recommend adding a cautionary note with reference to avoid misleading readers.

(Note: I'm here to advocate for serenitystocks.com and the correct application of Benjamin Graham's methods. Please see my user page for details)

CaptMalR (talk) 02:58, 10 August 2014 (UTC)Reply