Talk:Graham number
Add topic| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Section about origin/history/theory?
[edit]Would a section that described the theory behind why buying below the Graham number would be considered good be appropriate?.. Or would that be too POV.. (meaning, "is the whys of this generally discussed in micro/macro-econ textbooks?)
- (Useless humorous quip: I got to this page from the other Graham number page.. Buying below that Graham number would most certainly be considered a good thing!) --Jimw338 (talk) 03:23, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
Cautionary note required
[edit]Before being checked against the Graham Number, Benjamin Graham required that a stock first meet 6 other Qualitative Defensive criteria.
Using The Graham Number Correctly discusses the issue in detail.
I highly recommend adding a cautionary note with reference to avoid misleading readers.
(Note: I'm here to advocate for serenitystocks.com and the correct application of Benjamin Graham's methods. Please see my user page for details)
- Start-Class Finance & Investment articles
- Mid-importance Finance & Investment articles
- WikiProject Finance & Investment articles
- Start-Class Economics articles
- Low-importance Economics articles
- WikiProject Economics articles
- Start-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Mid-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- Start-Class mathematics articles
- Low-priority mathematics articles