Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23eff9f4d3d1ef0

Jump to content

Talk:Graham Leonard

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

War service

[edit]

Looks like he probably also served as an officer in the Oxfordshire and Buckinghamshire Light Infantry during WWII, but more sourcing would be needed to confirm this. David Underdown (talk) 10:19, 28 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

"Sir"?

[edit]

I removed "Sir" from Leonard's name as it doesn't seem that he was ever entitled to use his knighthood as a title. Although he later became a Roman Catholic I suspect that he would still not be entitled to be known as "Sir" unless he had also formally "resigned" his Anglican orders - which I am confident was not the case. Therefore, unless there is evidence to the contrary, it should be presumed that he was never actually entitled to the title of "Sir". Anglicanus (talk) 15:19, 2 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Ordination as Catholic Priest

[edit]

The article states that he received conditional ordination as a Catholic priest. I do not understand how this can be possible. The Catholic Church considers all Anglican ordinations to be invalid (its actual terminology is "absolutely null and utterly void" see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostolicae_Curae). Therefore, he would have received non-conditional (i.e. typical)ordination from a Catholic Bishop. Conditional sacraments, according to Catholic teaching, are only conferred when the validity of the original conferral is dubious. This is not the case here, because the non-validity is certain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.10.184.198 (talk) 00:06, 23 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Ignore the above. Later in the article it is explained. Perhaps this should be made clear in the introduction? Perhaps '(see below)' should be written? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.10.184.198 (talk) 00:10, 23 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Actually, the above is relevant. This article is confusing. It states he received Catholic priestly ordination, even though he had not previously been ordained deacon. Apparently John Paul II sanctioned this. The priest in question was formerly an Anglican cleric. Does this imply John Paul II affirmed the validity of the Anglican Diaconate? Really?

It states he was conditionally ordained to the priesthood. The basis of this was an Old Catholic co-consecrator at his Anglican episcopal consecration. That doesn't make any sense. This needs to be clarified. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.10.184.198 (talk) 00:25, 23 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Graham Leonard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:16, 26 November 2017 (UTC)Reply