Talk:Graduated majority judgment

Is the example totally wrong?

It seems to me that it's counting up scores from the bottom, as opposed to from the top. So A and B cross the 50% threshold first, but that makes them losers, not winners. C has a median score of 4, so is a winner, no tie breaker needed. In addition, according to the formula lower down, A would have a score of 3.1 and B would have 3.4, the reverse of what's stated.

Perhaps whoever wrote it want to reverse the entire election results? Jacehan (talk) 20:49, 3 November 2025 (UTC)