Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a250e12dc850c20a

Jump to content

Talk:Gourmandises

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 months ago by Gnomingstuff in topic Likely AI-generated edits
Former good articleGourmandises was one of the Music good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 19, 2025Good article nomineeListed
May 1, 2025Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Gourmandises. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:39, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Gourmandises. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:20, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

GA review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Gourmandises/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Ieslie (talk · contribs) 02:49, 18 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: 7n3 (talk · contribs) 15:55, 19 April 2025 (UTC)Reply


Hi. I will be reviewing this. It might take a while, but just know that it's part of nomination duty.

Background and composition: Looks good. In the sentences, "The album featured a mix of world music, pop, chanson, and dance styles." could use a citation that explains this. But still good.

Singles: Although it seems a little short for four singles, there are enough citations to prove every claim, so that's good as well.

Commercial performance: "...the album received great chart response, as well as sales." Could be reworded better. Again, there are fair amounts of citations to prove the album's commercial success, so that's good as well.

Critical reception: Looks good. However, this sentence, "In another review, Je ne sais pop wrote..." seems weird. Maybe reword it to, "In a review written by Jaime Cristóbal for Je ne sais pop..."

Legacy: The section looks great. I like the amount of citations used to verify every claim, and the additional picture for an M6 award. Very good!

Charts: Looks good. No major issues here.

Certifications and sales: No major issues here either. Could use a small section for world-wide sales. No issues with the "Release history" either.

Overall Pass/Fail: Pass. No issues other than slight sentence issues. I'll promote this as a GA.

Notes: Use this source [1], it may help you verify a few previous claims made without a citation.

Likely AI-generated edits

[edit]

Hi -- I added the AI generated template here regarding Ieslie's edits, which display many signs of LLM output; they definitely have inappropriate tone and may have hallucinations. Unfortunately they are blocked so we can't confirm the AI use.

As far as it being a GA, uh yeah that's gonna be a problem. Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:11, 30 August 2025 (UTC)Reply