Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gordon Cooper article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oklahoma on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OklahomaWikipedia:WikiProject OklahomaTemplate:WikiProject OklahomaOklahoma
Gordon Cooper is part of the Scouting WikiProject, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Scouting and Guiding on the Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to boy and girl organizations, WAGGGS and WOSM organizations as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to Scouting. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ScoutingWikipedia:WikiProject ScoutingTemplate:WikiProject ScoutingScouting
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Google shows 10x more "Gordon Cooper" with "astronaut" than "Gordo Cooper", so apparently the nickname never caught on as the usual way to refer to him. Stan 23:32, 18 Oct 2003 (UTC)
However, he wasn't the last individual to reach space alone.
Two flights of the X-15 later in 1963 passed the 100 km "edge of space". ... [SpaceShipOne] ...
These two paragraphs are inprecise. If "the last individual" does not rule out non-U.S. astronauts, then China's Yang Liwei and possibly some other Russian astronauts may count. Were there any trips that include "Home Alone" where a single man was on a space station or going home alone where a man went home by himself? -- Toytoy 13:59, Oct 7, 2004 (UTC)
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
There are no citations for the supposed quotes. And what's with the strange typography and quotation-mark pictures? Unless this is cleaned up, the whole section should be deleted.
Latest comment: 10 months ago5 comments2 people in discussion
Tom Wolfe's The Right Stuff is a novel, not a historical work, and it took many liberties with facts. If it's important to say that Yeager began using the term "Spam in a can", then we need a better source than a novel. Dcs002 (talk) 02:25, 30 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Yeah it is - a historical novel. It's riddled with fiction, composite characters, made up scenes, and artistic license, all for the purpose of making drama. E.g., Carpenter was depicted as a Marine though he was Navy. Making him a Marine helped expand and legitimize the fiction of John Glenn as the Dudley Do-Right and morality cop of the group. I think the drama really worked, but it was never a historical account, and many of its dramatic inaccuracies were famously offensive to the historical characters depicted (most notably the Gus "Squirmin' Hatchblower" Grissom episode). We need a better source. If that was a Yeager saying, it should be documented somewhere reliable. Dcs002 (talk) 04:50, 30 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
You mean on p. 113 where it says: "Not only that, there was this fellow from the Navy, Scott Carpenter. He seemed to be a likable sort—but he had never been in a fighter squadron. He had been flying multi-engine propeller planes and had only two hundred hours in jets."? Wolfe clearly states that Capenter was a Navy officer. I suggest you try reading the book. Hawkeye7(discuss)05:33, 30 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Fair point, my mistake. My memory of Carpenter was wrong (I don't know where that idea came from - it's not in the movie either, which I've seen far more times than I've read the book, so yeah), but there are literary fictions and inaccuracies in the book, like Annie Glenn refusing to see LBJ because of anxiety over her stutter rather than her migraine. She was really upset about that.
More to the point, every reference I can find to "Spam in a can" points back to Hormel or The Right Stuff, even in a NASA document on astronaut psychology. It's consistent with Wolfe's writing. He called it "New Journalism," in which telling the story well, using the tools of fiction writers, supersedes factual accuracy. It's good writing, but at best it's historically unreliable. Dcs002 (talk) 11:07, 30 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Is this article worthy of Featured Article status?