Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a258b6adee43610f

Jump to content

Talk:Good Old Neon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 months ago by AirshipJungleman29 in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 16:09, 3 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

  • Source: Mathematics in Postmodern American Fiction, page 262: "In the short story this strategy suggests a performance of the failure of language, whether natural or symbolic, to faithfully represent the infinitely dense temporality of the moment of death." Oblivion, page 167: "The thing is that it turns out that logical symbolism really would be the best way to express it [dying]"
Created by ALittleClass (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

ALittleClass (talk) 17:22, 3 August 2025 (UTC).Reply

    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
    Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
    QPQ: None required.
    Overall: Article was newly-expanded at the time of nomination, and is 995 words (5,939 characters) long. It is fully sourced, with the acceptable exception of the plot summary. It is neutral, balancing the positive and negative reviews. It is free from plagiarism, with Earwig only flagging clearly attributed quotes. Both hooks are cited and interesting to the average reader. This is the nominator's first nomination, so no QPQ is required. My only issue with the article is that its lead is too short to provide an accessible overview of the subject, but this does not affect DYK criteria. Grnrchst (talk) 17:17, 27 August 2025 (UTC)Reply