Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a241260dda671dfc

Jump to content

Talk:Good Morning Britain

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 months ago by Jeffrey34555 in topic Requested move 7 January 2026

Misleading title

[edit]

The present title suggests it was a programme broadcast some time in 2014. It would be better if it were changed to 'Good Morning Britain (TV series starting 2014)' (and similarly for the 1983 series of the same name). --Brian Josephson (talk) 13:18, 16 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

It's the disambiguation convention for all TV programmes. If two names clash you disambiguate them by the year the programme started. We keep disambiguations as short as possible. - X201 (talk) 14:02, 16 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
Would you be allowed to refer to it as Series instead of Programme? Titles should be as clear as possible. --Brian Josephson (talk) 14:33, 16 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
I see from various references that the convention seems to be to use the word 'show', which I think would distinguish it well from a single programme. That would make the title 'Good Morning Britain (2014 TV show)'. How about that? --Brian Josephson (talk) 14:38, 16 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
TV programme is the correct disambiguation. See Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(television)#Non-series_television - X201 (talk) 15:31, 16 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
The article says 'The show features interviews with celebrities and politicians as well as discussion of topical issues, with a reputation for often heated debates', so it seems to me that it could very well qualify as a Talk Show, defined in the following way on the naming convention page that you cite: 'A talk show (or chat show in British English) is a television programming or radio programming genre structured around the act of spontaneous conversation.' --Brian Josephson (talk) 15:47, 16 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
It's not a talk show. It uses elements of a talk show, but isn't a talk show in it's entirety. - X201 (talk) 10:16, 17 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Given that it is the worst of all corporate media styles, what about calling it Infotainment?  Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.166.177 (talk) 09:13, 11 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 17 November 2021

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) SkyWarrior 22:02, 24 November 2021 (UTC)Reply


– It's been over 7 years. The 80s programme will never be as notable as the current one. Unreal7 (talk) 16:48, 17 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:07, 1 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:37, 15 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 7 January 2026

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 03:15, 14 January 2026 (UTC)Reply


– I think this programme might be the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Based on the 2025 pageviews and recent pageviews alone, this article averages more pageviews than all the other articles combined, so it seems most people are looking for this programme. Additionally, this programme is now approaching its 12th year now, longer than the 1983 one, which was on for just under 10 years. Limmidy (talk) 01:57, 7 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.