Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24379e6c8778020

Jump to content

Talk:Good Hair

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 years ago by 108.36.193.88 in topic A Controversy Section For This Article

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 August 2019 and 6 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): AlexandriaMattox.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:32, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Untitled

[edit]

This article seems to be as much or more about covering the same material as the film does than about the film itself. Maybe there should be an article about the hair of black American women and the things they do to it (in other words, covering the same ground as Mr. Rock's film) and then this article can be edited to be just about the film. I think an article about a documentary should be about the film and not about the topic the documentary is about. (One assumes if the topic is significant enough to inspire a documentary, it's significant enough for a Wikipedia article about it, distinct from the article about the documentary.) I would flag this article if I knew which flag were appropriate.216.244.52.176 (talk) 16:53, 6 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

A Controversy Section For This Article

[edit]

The lawsuit section, The Oprah Winfrey Section, and the legacy section all bring up criticisms of the documentary, or controversy inspired by or related to the documentary. Would it be appropriate to shift all of those sections into a single "controversy" section for the film?  Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.36.193.88 (talk) 12:36, 30 March 2022 (UTC)Reply