Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2a851332ee8f25b

Jump to content

Talk:Golden Film/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 17 years ago by Rubenescio in topic GA Reassessment

GA Reassessment

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

I will be doing the GA Reassessment on this article in accordance with the GA sweeps project. H1nkles (talk) 01:59, 14 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

The article is still good, it's a fairly simple subject and comprehensive article. I note that ref [13] appears to be a WP site, which isn't a credible source. Otherwise it's fine and I will keep it as a GA. H1nkles (talk) 02:06, 14 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

This is discussed in this peer review, see the discussion after the point "Most refs look good but you cannot cite Wikipedia as a reliable source - ref 12." Rubenescio (talk) 09:36, 11 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
I have updated the article with three new awards and 2008 statistical data. Would adding a reference for each awarded film, 62 extra references in total, really improve this article? Rubenescio (talk) 10:26, 11 June 2009 (UTC)Reply