Talk:Gojek

Merger proposal

I propose to merge Coins.ph into Go-Jek per "Go-Jek buys fintech startup Coins.ph for $72M ahead of Philippines expansion". Coins.ph isn't very notable and likely to remain a stub. Џ 09:04, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Requested move 22 July 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: page moved. While we don't rely on brand name changes alone, the change in it's usage in reliable sources as pointed out in the discussion, among other things, is sufficient enough to justify this page move. (closed by non-admin page mover) Steven Crossin ^{Help resolve disputes!} 15:21, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

---

Go-Jek → Gojek – Go-Jek's brand name is now simply "Gojek" (without dash) starting from July 22, 2019 following the launch of their new logo. I can't move the page by myself because the new title that I want is currently used as redirect page. Tiktomoro (talk) 05:07, 22 July 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. bd2412 T 01:43, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 12:58, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

• @Tiktomoro, Dicklyon, and Tiktomoro: queried move request Anthony Appleyard (talk) 13:04, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
• Too soon. We wait for sources to reflect the new name being adopted. We don't go by logos. Dicklyon (talk) 05:38, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
• Maybe the way they write their own brand name in their website can be taken into consideration. The url address become "gojek.com" aswell (from previously "go-jek.com"). Indonesian media (Kompas, Tempo, and CNBC Indonesia) also write "Gojek" instead of "Go-Jek". Tiktomoro (talk)
• Support: Seems good enough to me. The company's URL was changed, the website says Gojek, the jackets worn by employees now have no hyphen, and some press articles are using the unhyphenated name too (this, this, this, this, this, and there are more). I see no reason there would be significant resistance to removing the hyphen. —BarrelProof (talk) 17:38, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
• Support per above. flixwito ^(•‿•)^ 12:49, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.