Talk:Goepfert case

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

China

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Taxation (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taxation, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.TaxationWikipedia:WikiProject TaxationTemplate:WikiProject TaxationTaxation

Assessment comment

Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Goepfert case/CommentsTalk:Goepfert case/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

==WP Tax Class==

Stub class because one section of information.EECavazos 19:55, 3 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

==WP Tax Priority==

Low priority because article on the case rather than the law itself.EECavazos 19:56, 3 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 19:56, 3 November 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 16:27, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Goepfert case

Assessment comment