Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Should this not be changed back to to Curried goat and the redirect reversed. The original editor got it right, as Curried is rightfully a verb, not noun. Ie. Goat that has been curried. It is slightly different (semantically) from a curry dish that has lamb, beef or chicken added (in which case it would be lamb curry etc) insomuch that it is the goat meat has been curried not the curry being goateefied. So Curried goat is more grammatically correct and in keeping with the WP's policy of using the popular name.--Aspro (talk) 15:11, 7 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
