Talk:Go Goa Gone

English.

Needs a serious grammar and spelling check... Also story part is a little too detailed for a synopsis summary with all those specific dialogue and joke mentions. 122.163.34.93 (talk) 06:44, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

The problem was the story section which was written in inappropriate way with many jokes. For now, I've removed that section, if someone wants to write in a better way then they are welcome to do so. Tolly4bolly 08:51, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Go Goa Gone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boxofficeindia.com/Movies/movie_detail/go_goa_gone
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130502080217/http://www.hindustantimes.com:80/Entertainment/Bollywood/Go-Goa-Gone-trailer-goes-viral/Article1-1033675.aspx to http://www.hindustantimes.com/Entertainment/Bollywood/Go-Goa-Gone-trailer-goes-viral/Article1-1033675.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:32, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Likely AI generated edits

Hi - I added the AI generated tag here in reference to the edits by Thefallguy2025. Their contributions have consistently displayed indicators of potential LLM output (some of their past edits have kept the chatgpt parameter in the refs), and so I am tagging them all as it is unlikely they suddenly stopped using it.

Since their text remains in the current version of this article, and it is unclear how much review was done of the output, it all needs review for sourcing, tone, accuracy/hallucinations, etc. (This applies even to changes that are "just" copy edits, as AI copy edits commonly introduce editorializing, subtle factual errors, unattributed opinion, non-neutral language, etc., even when they claim otherwise.) Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:34, 17 September 2025 (UTC)