Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a27e15d28862b87b

Jump to content

Talk:Ghisolfi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 19 years ago by PresN in topic GAC
Former good article nomineeGhisolfi was a History good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 15, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed

[Untitled]

[edit]

That Ivan III is called czar in this article, coupled with numerous spelling mistakes, casts doubts on the valdity of its content. --Ghirla -трёп- 13:26, 24 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

See the article on Czar. Ivan III did use the title in correspondence etc. Ivan IV was the first to formally incorporate the title in his coronation. Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 15:54, 24 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
Yaroslav the Wise also used this title, but we don't call him tsar, do we? By the way, don't you think that Zacharias de Ghisolfi is better be split into separate article? --Ghirla -трёп- 16:08, 24 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
So we don't have to call him Czar if you don't want to. My point was that the quotation from Ivan's letter is not in se unreliable because it uses the word Czar, as Ivan III did use the title. I'm not sure that there is enough info to warrant splitting Zacharias off but I'm not opposed to the idea. Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 18:25, 24 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

GAC

[edit]
  1. Well-written: Pass
  2. Factually accurate: Pass
  3. Broad: Fail
  4. Neutrally written: Pass
  5. Stable: Pass
  6. Well-referenced: Pass
  7. Images: Pass

There are things that I could pick apart on this article, and I would not pass it anyway, but I won't even get to them, because this article has a very glaring problem. The article name is "Ghisolfi", and the lead talks about the Ghisolfi family, and what it was and when it was, but then the rest of the article is about Zacharias de Ghisolfi. As the title of the article is not Zacharias de Ghisolfi, that is a problem. Move the article to Zacharias de Ghisolfi, change the lead to talk about him rather than the family he was a part of, and try again. --PresN 04:54, 15 January 2007 (UTC)Reply