Talk:GetJet Airlines
Add topicLatest comment: 4 years ago by Community Tech bot in topic A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Questionable practices of its sister company
[edit]This section needs more references as well as a clean up. It shouldn't take over the article as it appears WP:RECENTISM and WP:COATRACK.NZFC(talk)(cont) 11:36, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- The editor who added the criticism of a sister company, AviaticMRO, was Spontiac (talk · contribs). I left a note to see if they want to join this discussion, though they have not been active since 11 February. Per WP:COAT we don't usually like to see short articles containing lots of negative material. We do not have an article on AviaticMRO, so how come its tribulations need to be discussed in the GetJet Airlines article? The header of the new section added by Spontiac was "Association with bribery allegations of its parent company". What published sources use the word 'bribery'?. At this point we are deep into the area of BLP violations. EdJohnston (talk) 19:30, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- I'm happy for it to be removed. I'm sorry I reverted IP and their account as at the time it looked like vandalism, especially using "Fake news" but they appear to be right and information isn't relevant for this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NZFC (talk • contribs) 09:09, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
.svg){kind=link}
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:21, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}