Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2533df499abd96e

Jump to content

Talk:Gerald Coates

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 17 years ago by Hyper3 in topic Untitled

Untitled

[edit]

This is an article about a person, not about a network. Just because a person is a farmer, that doesn't make her belong in Category:Farming, nor do we put physicists in Category:Physics. Gene Nygaard (talk) 05:05, 22 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

The approach depends upon the category. This category has two elements: "apostles" and their networks. They are coinherent; no apostle without a network, no apostolic network without an apostle. Because "apostle" is an office occupied by a person, and that office is established through planting churches and creating a network, I differ with your analysis. (All of this within the world-view of the apostolic network.) As evidence, I would suggest that the article about the apostle has a lot to say about the apostle's work, and the article about the network has a lot about the apostle.Hyper3 (talk) 10:50, 22 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
Interestingly enough, looking at Category:Physics I see Physicists is a subcategory. Hyper3 (talk) 11:14, 22 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Christian Evangelicalism category

[edit]

Looking at the contents of the category, in retrospect, I think I see your point - what would be better? Hyper3 (talk) 10:56, 22 December 2008 (UTC)Reply