Talk:Geosynthetics
Add topicLatest comment: 17 years ago by Stuartfost in topic Wikified External Links
 | Geosynthetics was a Engineering and technology good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Rewritten
[edit]I have rewritten and extended the article. Although it is by no means finished it has a backbone of a good article hopefully. Further edits, extensions and comments will be welcommed. Grahams Child 20:29, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
Good Article nomination has failed
[edit]The Good article nomination for Geosynthetics has failed, for the following reason(s):
- I don't think this yet qualifies as well written - each paragraph seems more like a short definition than encyclopaedic prose. The bullet pointed list under disadvantages should be converted to prose. And section headings need to follow the capitalisation described in the WP:MOS. Finally, a standard width should be used for images for aesthetic reasons. Alternating left and right alignment also usually looks better. Worldtraveller 11:53, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Wikified External Links
[edit]Wiki edit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stuartfost (talk • contribs) 13:23, 13 August 2008 (UTC)