Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a240311f9b56c235

Jump to content

Talk:George Seeman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by SL93 in topic Did you know nomination

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:George Seeman/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: BeanieFan11 (talk · contribs) 04:07, 9 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 19:31, 9 February 2025 (UTC)Reply


I'll do this one. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 19:31, 9 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Comments

[edit]
  • Add a sentence to the lead that summarizes his "Later life and death"
  • If this is the correct all-star game, link Chicago Charities College All-Star Game
  • "for the team." -> "for the Chiefs."
  • In Note A about his last name, add a source that spells it that way.
  • In the last paragraph of the lead, you have two consecutive sentences cited to the same source. You only need one after the second sentence.
  • References:
    • Add an access-date to Ref 5
    • All references are reliable for what is being cited
    • Spot checks: 1, 5, 6, 8, and 9 all checked out.

Nice work BeanieFan11. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 23:09, 9 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 03:36, 9 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Improved to Good Article status by BeanieFan11 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 300 past nominations.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:51, 18 February 2025 (UTC).Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: GTG! I think you could use the image from the newspaper clipping as it might be PD. 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neostalkedits) 13:39, 1 March 2025 (UTC)Reply