Talk:Geoffrey Samuel
Add topicLatest comment: 5 years ago by Pasdecomplot in topic Why are Samuels' opinions being layered through Buddhist articles?
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Why are Samuels' opinions being layered through Buddhist articles?
[edit]Why? Seen his opinions in Karmapa controversy, in Tibetan Buddhism, and in Nyingma so far. Which are odd because his opinions are slightly weighted and bordering on mischaracterizations, as if his purpose is denigration. Yet it says here he's a scholar. Just wondering who's responsible so I can better understand. Pasdecomplot (talk) 18:12, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- And, why is his promotional page in Wikipedia?
Categories:
- Biography articles of living people
- Start-Class Yoga articles
- Low-importance Yoga articles
- WikiProject Yoga articles
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles