Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23e43b03873ddf0

Jump to content

Talk:Gentrification

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Something very wrong with this article

[edit]

This article feels like someone got ahold of it and tried to make it into a Pro-Gentrification Propaganda piece. The last part about taking legal action against the Gentrification groups is a case in point. The first three Paragraphs (?????) are statements of how wonderful (My paraphrase ) Gentrification is. Then the very last line which reads like a throw-away line, something about the Fair Housing Act.

My suggestion is completely delete this so-called Article then try again except this time make it neutral!!! MagnummSerpentinee (talk) 05:04, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Back when I was studying geography at school and university (1996-2006) gentrification was seen as an almost exclusively positive thing. Seems it has become more and more disliked as time goes on, possibly the meaning of it has changed as gentrification used to mean taking an area out of poverty and crime and making it more liveable.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C7:6388:4F01:55FC:79E:57A5:22A9 (talk) 21:56, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

> I got the same feeling right away I saw the "pros & cons table" and the very first point in the pros is "reducing crime". I can only hear POC exhaling a very loud sigh. 83.31.236.187 (talk) 12:46, 1 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

I've opted to remove that and add more to the crime section. I agree that this article does seem rather one-sided in places (for both sides of the debate). – Isochrone (talk) 17:10, 31 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
I am going to start by changing the heading of "gentrifier types" is too vague and the subgroups listed under it like "women" and "artist" do not really convey the way these groups can also be the victims of gentrification. Such as acknowledging that poor women of color are women. Some groups can be both agents and later become victims of gentrification. BrendaLQM (talk) 19:26, 15 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Everyone, at least, everyone that rents, can be both agents and victims of gentrification, apart perhaps from a few billionaires who can't be outbid by anyone and a few homeless people that can't outbid anyone. More or less everyone can also be both drivers and victims of de-gentrification. LastDodo (talk) 14:09, 22 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: Documenting Queer of Color Cultural Production

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 January 2025 and 9 May 2025. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): BrendaLQM (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Keurigslanderpage (talk) 06:23, 9 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Rural areas

[edit]

Does working-class rural areas converted to exurban housing for the wealthy count as gentrification? Although the location is different, the mechanisms and effects are basically the same. No mention of that phenomenon in this article; not sure if should be, or is covered elsewhere. 57.140.48.1 (talk) 06:54, 18 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: ENGL 120-06

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 12 January 2026 and 8 May 2026. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Madi Boone.

— Assignment last updated by Madi Boone (talk) 20:44, 11 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Proposed addition: Cultural and political displacement

[edit]

The article's coverage of gentrification's effects focuses primarily on physical displacement and economic shifts but does not address cultural or political displacement, meaning the loss of community identity, political voice, and social networks that can occur even when residents are not physically moved. This is a well-documented phenomenon in the academic literature.

I propose adding a short subsection under "Effects" drawing primarily on:

  • Hyra, Derek S. (2017). Race, Class, and Politics in the Cappuccino City. University of Chicago Press. An ethnographic study of the Shaw/U Street neighborhood in Washington, DC documenting political and cultural displacement of long-term Black residents.
  • Finio, Nicholas (2022). "Measurement and Definition of Gentrification in Urban Studies and Planning." Journal of Planning Literature 37(2): 249–264. A comprehensive review of gentrification measurement methodologies.

The proposed text also addresses the distinction between developer-driven gentrification and community-guided revitalization, which the article currently does not cover.

Draft text is at User:GeographerJay/sandbox#Proposed Edits to Gentrification Article. Feedback welcome. ~~~~ GeographerJay (talk) 17:20, 11 April 2026 (UTC)Reply