Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23ffabe4e9dc6fa

Jump to content

Talk:Genetic admixture

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 years ago by BhagyaMani in topic African lions

Merge suggestion

[edit]

This article is so short that it needs to be either expanded or merged with Genetic admixture. Talking image (talk) 00:52, 6 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Done. WTF? (talk) 17:51, 5 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

African lions

[edit]

BhagyaMani You were the one who used the word 'admixture' (in the context of genetics) for lions in the Horn of Africa or Northeast Africa in the first place, so now why did you contradict your earlier statement in this article, even though you agreed that there is genetic admixture in this article, at almost the same time? Leo1pard (talk) 05:12, 13 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

1. As already briefly explained in my edit summary, this is apparently not a good example to explain the concept of genetic admixture, as the addition and ref raised such a controversy and reverts. 2. I have nothing to do with this wiki article on Northeast African lion, but consider it redundant. 3. Genetic admixture affects a few individuals in a population, but not necessarily the whole population in a given area; the fact that a handful of samples with P. l. leo haplotypes were found in lion samples from Ethiopia does not mean that the whole lion population in Northeast Africa is admixed. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 11:13, 13 June 2018 (UTC)Reply