Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2524facff5ec78f

Jump to content

Talk:Generalized estimating equation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 25 days ago by Abcdane1 in topic GEE unbiased coefficient estimates?

Formulation

[edit]

Neither k nor are defined in this section. Though in particular may be commonly used to mean a particular regression parameter, these have to be defined or the mathematical formulation is just meaningless. Please define these terms for the readers of this page. Thanks.  Preceding unsigned comment added by Chafe66 (talkcontribs) 23:46, 13 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, @mark viking for adding definitions. Chafe66 (talk) 16:56, 12 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
It's still missing plenty of definitions. is presumably the endogenous values being fit (but then why doesn't it have a subscript?) and is the number of subjects. But we don't have definitions of either of , . I suspect that there is some typo or omission in this equation given that each occur only once. 165.123.230.45 (talk) 15:38, 9 October 2019 (UTC)Reply


Is it semi-parametric? Other discussions linked to in this article (e.g. the stata command description) make it seem fully parametric. Stata describes it as requiring a full distributional assumption on the distribution and a fully specified link function -- thats parametric. R code manuals suggest the same -- requiring specification of a choice of distribution. Contrast with GLM seems to be more about changing the dependence assumptions between observations than about allowing for less in the way of distributional assumptions.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.231.249.133 (talk) 20:03, 31 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

GEEs can be defined for any exponential family response distribution

[edit]

GEEs are not semiparametric, and support the use of any exponential family response distribution & various link functions, cran.r-project.org/web/packages/gee/gee.pdf. What types of response distributions can be supported now is not mentioned; implicitly only the case with normal errors is now mentioned. The text of this article seems a bit poorly written. At the bottom in this chat maybe some material that could be useful for a more extensive article, covering how GEEs can be fit for various exponential family response distributions & link functions, https://chatgpt.com/share/671ba4c4-85c4-8000-8578-1fc2053cb842 2A02:1811:418:1400:D0A:89FF:572:E9FE (talk) 14:03, 25 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

GEE unbiased coefficient estimates?

[edit]

"Regression beta coefficient estimates from the Liang-Zeger GEE are consistent, unbiased, and asymptotically normal even when the working correlation is misspecified, under mild regularity conditions."

The coefficient estimators are generally not unbiased with non-identity link functions. Can this be clarified? Abcdane1 (talk) 16:30, 8 July 2026 (UTC)Reply