Talk:Gene Marks
Add topicLatest comment: 6 days ago by Cormanykr in topic Is the subject noteworthy enough to warrant an article?
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Very poorly sourced article. There's a claim to six best-selling books but nothing to substantiate that they sold well. There's also a verbatime quote from his own blog. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.118.43.16 (talk) 16:16, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Is the subject noteworthy enough to warrant an article?
[edit]The entire article reads like a LinkedIn profile. As highlighted by a previous user (dated 13 October 2021), the sources are very poor; most of them are written directly by the subject. The subject simply does not seem influential nor noteworthy enough as to warrant having an article, especially one so poorly written and sourced. Cormanykr (talk) 17:55, 26 July 2026 (UTC)